Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google

Liste des GroupesRevenir à nan email 
Sujet : Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.email
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 16:45:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <uskkj5$rro$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On the contrary, I find Gmail perfectly satisfactory, reliable and
99.9% spam free.  I have several Gmail accounts in daily use.

Gmail is very good about filtering incoming spam, and reasonably okay
about filtering outgoing spam.  There is still a good bit of spam from
gmail, but considering how many users they have it's not very much at
all.

Gmail is actually attended... there are armies of people behind the
scenes fine-tuning things and watching things.  Google Groups is not
this way.

Gmail is actually a revenue source for Google, although they do offer
a whole lot of free accounts.  Because it is a revenue source they take
good care of it.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google29Andrzej Adam Filip
9 Mar 24 +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Scott Dorsey
9 Mar 24 i+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google4Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3The Doctor
10 Mar 24 ii `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24 ii  `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 i`- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 +- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google15The Doctor
10 Mar 24 i+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Sn!pe
10 Mar 24 ii+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3The Doctor
10 Mar 24 iii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Sn!pe
10 Mar 24 iii `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Scott Dorsey
10 Mar 24 ii `- Re: Is Google-good (gmail) good? [Was: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google]1Andrzej Adam Filip
11 Mar 24 i`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google8Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24 i `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google7The Doctor
11 Mar 24 i  `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24 i   `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google5The Doctor
10 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2The Doctor
28 Jun 24 i    i `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1Randolf Richardson 張文道
26 Apr 24 i    `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1David Ritz
10 Mar 24 `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6tjoen
10 Mar 24  +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24  i`- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24  +- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
11 Mar 24  `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24   `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal