Re: Is Google-good (gmail) good? [Was: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google]

Liste des GroupesRevenir à nan email 
Sujet : Re: Is Google-good (gmail) good? [Was: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google]
De : anfi (at) *nospam* onet.eu (Andrzej Adam Filip)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.email
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 17:47:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : It is for me to know and for you to find out.
Message-ID : <anfi+r49dfun6mf-o3a0@wp.eu>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On the contrary, I find Gmail perfectly satisfactory, reliable and
99.9% spam free.  I have several Gmail accounts in daily use.
>
Gmail is very good about filtering incoming spam, and reasonably okay
about filtering outgoing spam.  There is still a good bit of spam from
gmail, but considering how many users they have it's not very much at
all.
>
Gmail is actually attended... there are armies of people behind the
scenes fine-tuning things and watching things.  Google Groups is not
this way.
>
Gmail is actually a revenue source for Google, although they do offer
a whole lot of free accounts.  Because it is a revenue source they take
good care of it.
--scott

Google-good care may seem quite unlike good care IMHO.

--
A. Filip

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google29Andrzej Adam Filip
9 Mar 24 +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Scott Dorsey
9 Mar 24 i+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google4Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3The Doctor
10 Mar 24 ii `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24 ii  `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 i`- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 +- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google15The Doctor
10 Mar 24 i+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Sn!pe
10 Mar 24 ii+* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3The Doctor
10 Mar 24 iii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Sn!pe
10 Mar 24 iii `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Scott Dorsey
10 Mar 24 ii `- Re: Is Google-good (gmail) good? [Was: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google]1Andrzej Adam Filip
11 Mar 24 i`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google8Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24 i `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google7The Doctor
11 Mar 24 i  `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24 i   `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google5The Doctor
10 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google3Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2The Doctor
28 Jun 24 i    i `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1Randolf Richardson 張文道
26 Apr 24 i    `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1David Ritz
10 Mar 24 `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google6tjoen
10 Mar 24  +* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Andrzej Adam Filip
10 Mar 24  i`- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
10 Mar 24  +- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor
11 Mar 24  `* Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google2Randolf Richardson 張文道
11 Mar 24   `- Re: Spamcop-top200 incomplete archives at Google1The Doctor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal