Sujet : Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 15. Oct 2024, 15:40:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vem5sm.ap8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Eric M <
conanospamic@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 14/10/2024 à 17:24, R Daneel Olivaw a écrit :
There are multiple Usenet providers catering for the the French language
crew, right? Some delete what they consider to be spam and some leave
it in there. Why don't those who want this stuff use Usenet servers
which leave it up and those who don't can use servers which scrub it?
It beats you having flame wars here, 'cos everyone's position seems to
be entrenched.
I don't want to start a flame war, I just want to be heard, it's not only
my opinion, people are complaining that their groups are harder to read.
Some of them will leave eventually.
So why don't you filter these 'abusive' posts and learn others to do
the same?
I'm sorry to rain on your parade, but your 'problem' is by no means
unique. We all have our share of trolls, loons, jerks, creeps and
otherwise unwanted posters/postings. We just filter/ignore them and move
on. If you can't handle that, get off unmoderated Usenet.