Sujet : Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 15. Oct 2024, 18:32:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vemg0i.i50.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Eric M <
conanospamic@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 15/10/2024 à 17:29, Frank Slootweg a écrit :
Translation: You can't deliver the goods and you can't be bothered to
do *your* bit to get rid of the alleged "abuse". All you do is complain
and expect others to somehow magically solve your 'problems'.
It can be done in 2 minutes, just 2 accounts to delete and it's over.
That assumes that these account accounts should be deleted, which is
the question under debate. You saying that it's abuse, doesn't make it
so, quite the contrary, based on past experience.
You didn't even answer my question if you had asked the i2pn2 admin.
From your non-response I can only conclude that you didn't, exactly
like I said.
You're a good troll, I feel forced to answer :)
>
*I mean hundreds of messages in a day on the group debatting of abuses.
Not snipping but not reading, is this better ?
Well, no and yes. No, that you should read and respond / taken action.
Yes, in the sense that it confirms you're sticking your head in the sand.
EOT for good, you won't change your mind and I won't change mine.
Probably true for the latter part(s), but I strongely doubt the first.
-- Frank Slootweg, just returned from a nice trip to the south of France! :-)