Sujet : Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 17. Oct 2024, 16:41:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <veri7p.8hc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Eric M <
conanospamic@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 17/10/2024 à 14:06, noel a écrit :
No, its not a protest, because nobody here can force change
I said what I had to say to the person that can do something about it,
it's up to him to see now, EOT.
Nope, it's *not* up to him. It's up to *you*, taking noel's advice -
which you again snipped -, which is the exact same as mine, client-side
filtering.
And no, the i2pn2 admin can *not* "do something about it", because he
*should* not do anything about it. You've not shown abuse of the net
(flooding) and you've not shown actionable abuse on the net.
What you *have* shown, is that you want/demand others to do your work
for you. Earth to Eric M.: Not going to happen.