Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.

On Fri, 18 Oct 24 14:49:03 +0000, Eric M <conanospamic@gmail.com> wrote:

Le 18/10/2024 � 15:49, Frank Slootweg a �crit :

  If so, as I said, you should have chosen a different 'opponent'. *The
OP* is the one who wants "official censorship" to be carried out by the
i2pn2 admin,

>
No. It's hard not to reply when what I say is constantly twisted. I only
want two accounts to be destroyed, for technical reasons (I may say also
for technical reasons, but the netiquette seems to be completely ignored
now). I could give you another account on i2pn2 which supports Hezbollah,
but no technical abuse, so I don't say anything.
>
I'm sorry this thread got so long, but many trolls, french and US, came to
bash me. If you want to talk calmly my mail is valid as is. And I don't
think something else important was discussed here before, but I'm not for
flooding, so let's end this.
>
(For the "nazi" part it was a mail three months ago, in France you can't
quote a mail without the approval of the person who wrote it, but it's ok,
he could even file a complaint against me but then I would produce what
comes out of his server.)

responding to known trolls is only advisable when any replies may
be helpful to other (normal, non-troll) readers; e.g. the acronym
e.o.d. in context means "end of discussion", meaning it's settled

politics and religion has ever been anathema to reason and common
sense . . . recommend cease and desist . . . lay off the libation