Sujet : Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.
De : none (at) *nospam* no.invalid (Thomas Alexandre)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 18. Oct 2024, 21:19:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : 🍿🍺
Message-ID : <6712c2ce$0$519$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Le 14 Oct 2024 15:46:09 GMT, Frank Slootweg a écrit :
Thomas Alexandre <none@no.invalid> wrote:
Excessive Cross-Posting (ECP) is an abuse.
FSVSVO "Excessive". For most servers, 3 newsgroups isn't anywhere
even close to excessive.
What you're probably referring to cross-posting between some specific
groups which is 'not allowed' according to the group(s)' charter.
On the fr.* hierarchy, crossposting to 3 newsgroups (without a fu2) *is*
excessive and considered as a *network* abuse on all groups on fr.*
I'm really sorry for sniping the remaining of your message but that's the
point everyone is missing in this unreal thread.
The fr.* hierarchy has its own rules about *network* abuses which are, by
far, much more restrictive that any others. Don't blame me, I didn't write
them, those were decided on fr.usenet.abus.d
And to be clear: I don't give a shit about what Eric M or "Jean-Paul" are
whining about and I'm NOT arguing about free speech vs censorship. I'm just
pointing out that rules on fr.* about *network* abuses are different.
Newsmasters are obviously free to ignore them or take them into account.
And frankly, I don't care. In the end it's a matter of reputation as truly
mentionned by some people in this thread.
-- "Ce qu'il faut au fond pour obtenir une espèce de paix avec les hommes,(...) c'est leur permettre en toutes circonstances, de s'étaler, de sevautrer parmi les vantardises niaises. Il n'y a pas de vanitéintelligente. C'est un instinct." - Céline