Re: Multiple abuses from i2pn2.

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:15:47 +0200, nestorlambda <nestorlambda@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

Le 20/10/24 � 11:54, Olivier Miakinen a �crit�:

One(�) has 9 votes against 4(�) for the cancellation of all his crossposts (with
or without followup-to), but not for the cancellation of all his non-crossposted
articles (only 5 votes against 8).

>
You are a small group of unbridled censors. The only thing that counts
is the rule of 80 more Yes votes than No votes which has always governed
usnet.
Vous etes un groupuscules de censeurs effr�n�s. Seule compte la r�gle de
80 votes Oui de plus que de Non qui a toujours r�gi usnet.
? ?   Nursery rhyme for elephant-man:
https://youtu.be/Ns92r5TQH3k?t=116   Birth of a cancelbot :
https://youtu.be/_kKHCVIdUBk?t=21

there are at least two hundred forty-seven (247) newsgroups in the
fr.* hierarchy (fr.bienvenue - fr.usenet.usages...possibly more on
some servers) of which only five of these newsgroups are moderated:

 fr.misc.bavardages.dinosaures m
 fr.usenet.abus.nocem m
 fr.usenet.abus.rapports m
 fr.usenet.forums.annonces m
 fr.usenet.stats m

they say that most newsservers do not accept or apply these nocems
or cancels, so wouldn't it be more effective to moderate disrupted
newsgroups than continually pound their rickety podium for "votes"?