Sujet : Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 10. Nov 2024, 19:05:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vgr04l.v10.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Jean-Paul <
contact@usenet.ovh> wrote:
Pluto <Pluto@fido.net> composa la prose suivante:
D wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:02:02 +0000, tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
Archive-name: usenet/spam-faq
Posting-Frequency: weekly
Last-modified: 1998/11/10
^^^^ ^^ ^^
". . . while you're in hibernation . . . it's exactly like being asleep . . ."
>
What is your problem?
This is a document which is posted weekly but has not been modified for
26 years. I'd consider "monthly" to be sufficient.
You have been posting pointless replies for over two months now, don't
you have any other hobbies? Or a life?
Yes, monthly is probably sufficient.
But the current frequency is not a problem.
And for those who think it's a problem: Your killfile is your friend! :-)
FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines