Sujet : Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : news.admin.net-abuse.usenetDate : 24. Nov 2024, 19:03:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vhvtac.nm4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Olivier Miakinen <om+
news@miakinen.net> wrote:
Le 24/11/2024 14:43, Pluto a écrit :
Richard Kettlewell wrote:
Pluto <Pluto@fido.net> writes:
D wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 00:02:02 +0000, tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
?D? is obviously not listening, please spare the rest of us your
complaints.
He is definitely listening, just ignoring. I'm away from my computers
next weekend anyway so you will get your wish.
If you want, someone can take your place as the guy who always answers
to D who always answers to Tim Skirvin who always posts every week.
And maybe there can be someone who always answers to Pluto who always answers
to D who always answers to Tim Skirvin who always posts every week. Is anyone
interested in the job? It's not very well paid, but it's a stable position.
If *that* doesn't call for its very own weekly posted FAQ, I don't
know what *does*!
FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines