Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines

"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> composa la prose suivante:

Jean-Paul <contact@usenet.ovh> wrote:

D <noreply@mixmin.net> composa la prose suivante:

Sun, 23 Feb 2025 00:02:01 +0000, tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:

>

Archive-name: usenet/spam-faq
Posting-Frequency: weekly
Last-modified: 1998/11/10

               ^^^^ ^^ ^^
 ". . . nothing in the ships log . . ."

>

       1998/11/10 (derelict "faq")
     - 1977/11/17 (skirvin's dob)
     = 7663 days (~20.9806 years)

>

       9602 days since moon-shot
     = 26.289 years and counting . . .

>

Yes, it's an old document.
But an old document can still be relevant: see the Bible ;-)

>

Be constructive, start a discussion to find out if anything needs
to be changed in this faq.

>
Why would you expect "D" to obey this 10,325th exhortation to
"be constructive", having disobeyed the previous 10,324th such
instructions?
>
Dude, spit the hook out. You've been trolled,

Possible.

It was the second and last time I'd made this constructive suggestion.
His messages on this subject will be ignored from now on, since “D ”
seems to be read-only.