Sujet : Re: inn2 peering configs questions - hispagatos wrong?
De : no-reply (at) *nospam* no.spam (Billy G. (go-while))
Groupes : news.admin.peeringDate : 28. May 2024, 09:28:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : github.com/go-while
Message-ID : <665579b2$1$31828$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 25.05.24 12:02, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
Hi Billy,
:*,!control*,!junk,!local.*,\
In addition to what has already been rightly said in this thread, I would recommend "!control,!control.*" instead of "!control*" because it otherwise excludes possible hierarchies like a controllers.* one.
great!
another question i have is the order.
why do * first and then denials afterwards?
why not put entries with ! or @ first and put the single * to the end?
...
...
while i'm asking myself i jumped into the source and found this:
https://github.com/InterNetNews/inn/blob/0ff2d3ae0912cf2098d20aaecc900bb5b9e472b2/innd/newsfeeds.c#L363/*
** Modify "subbed" according to the patterns in "patlist."
*/
static void
SITEsetlist(char **patlist, char *subbed, char *poison, bool *poisonEntry)
looks like cfg gets read at once and sets some bits somewhere else.
so i believe the order should not matter?
Thank you