Sujet : Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure?
De : mm (at) *nospam* dorfdsl.de (Marco Moock)
Groupes : news.admin.peeringDate : 12. Jul 2025, 19:55:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250712205507.6a4eda98@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
References : 1
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
On 12.07.2025 10:21 Uhr Anonymous wrote:
Some have claimed that Rocksolid Light is insecure. They have claimed
that there are many vulnerabilities in the codebase. They have
claimed that Rocksolid Light should not be used or peered.
Yet I have not seen a single supposed vulnerability demonstrated.
I have not seen any CVE filings.
Can anyone demonstrate and prove any of the claimed exploits?
It least older versions were vulnerable to SQL injections that made
creating files in the spool directory possible. The files.php file also
seems vulnerable to such attacks.
-- kind regardsMarcoSend spam to 1752308479muell@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure?
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure?