Sujet : Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
De : spb (at) *nospam* pobox.com (Steve Bonine)
Groupes : news.groups.proposalsDate : 10. Apr 2025, 20:53:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vt9ibn$1hbu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
candycanearter07 wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote at 03:14 this Tuesday (GMT):
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all. The reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/ group
is fairly active comparatively.
>
Lynn
alt.* newsgroups aren't technically official.
And a newsgroup in the comp hierarchy would be more "official"? You have an interesting definition of the term "official".
There is a proposal on the table to create a new newsgroup. To my knowledge the response has been underwhelming. There is already a presence for the topic in UseNet, notwithstanding how "official" it might be. There is a presence on Reddit that is "fairly active comparatively". There's a website with user forums, and a discord group.
Do I really need to type, "Why do we need a group in comp?"
Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
