Re: 1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator

Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:

On 04.01.2025 15:38 Uhr Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

At least rec.arts.movies.reviews hasn't been "unused for years".

 
Do you see a change to revive that, either by finding a new mod or
changing it to unmoderated?

I see a chance to revive it, it was obviously seeing use until the
moderation apparantly failed sometime in the last six months.

rec.arts.movies.reviews Reviews of movies. (Moderated) 

 
Hey, you sure this isn't still working? It's been low traffic for a
long time and with last post from August 2024 I still would've
still thought of it as active (since I'm purely a review reader not
a review writer, it's not my place to try posting).

 
rec-arts-movies-reviews:        mod-bounce.no-mod-info@isc.org
 
This is the current state in the aliases file, so currently no mod
exist and the group can't be used.

The last post I see is:

Subject: The Clogging
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 14:45:20 -0400
Message-ID: <Ub6hp7$qgh5$1@dont-email.me>

Includes header:
Approved: rec-arts-movies-reviews-moderator@robomod.net

So if that "robomod" isn't working anymore it must be a recent
failure. It ought to get a chance at being fixed, not deleted
within six months.

https://rec.arts.movies.reviews.narkive.com/
Last post is more than 10 years ago.

Must be a glitch at that website, I see hundreds of posts after the
latest one shown there. Oversights like this are a good case for
not doing mass-deletion RFDs.

--
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#