Sujet : Re: Pearls Before Swine: Banned Books
De : rja.carnegie (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Robert Carnegie)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written rec.arts.comics.stripsDate : 08. Mar 2024, 11:22:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <useotp$1krmf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 19/02/2024 21:32, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2024 23:38:59 -0800, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>
>> Pearls Before Swine: Banned Books
>>
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2024/02/04 >>
>> I am a devout Christian but I don't want to live in a theocracy. I also
>> don't trust anyone to make up a list of banned books.
>
> In recent history over 50 Dilbert comics books
> have been banned! Let's see Pearls Before Swine
> complain about that!
>
> And Tom Tomorrow in his comic strip suggests
> that Floridians will be forced to read Dilbert,
> so that would be forcing people to read apparently
> offensive books and anyone who's gone to school
> knows what it's like to be forced to read
> offensive books like The Color Purple.
I'm cautiously interpreting this as mostly
nonsense.
Regarding _The Color Purple_, I have not
read it or watched the film(s). I prefer
not to. I believe I know enough details
of the story to say that the characters'
misfortunes seem to be portrayed with
historical accuracy. I regret the
misfortunes. However, I do not wish
to experience them myself in these forms.
If it's a school assignment, I'll brace
myself. But the controversial book of the
day was _Adventures of Huckleberry Finn_,
was it not?