Re: Cartoon Logic

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

 Binky bleated:
 

In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:
 

In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

Mickmane wrote:
 

On 05.03.24, solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:

On 05.03.24, Blueshirt  <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

 

Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
 

I should maybe ask google who that is.

 A Spider-Man villain.

 Ah! Thanks. :)
 Not sure if I watched that movie.

 Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
famous enough!

 In movies and the 1960s TV show!!

 The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
 (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
anyway.)

 1904s and 1950s of course!

 How many 1904s were there?
 

 I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character created in
1962.

 And the Bat?

There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and nothing even bat
like associated with Spider-Man. We were talking about Spider-Man, after
discussing Norman Osborn, who was the Green Goblin in Spider-Man
continuity, which we got to via a discussion on Goblins as seen in “The
Church on Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who connection at last!
So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats probably won’t
tell us about how many 1904s there were … which is what you were asked, as
you brought them up.
--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor