Re: From the Archives .....

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <v09h5j$1th3u$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

>
Chibnall's revisions must be retconned!

 
As shown above, Chibnall’s Timeless Child narrative can be made to be
completely consistent with the entire history of the show. It was crafted
that way.
 
It’s awfully convoluted and contrived, and completely unnecessary. But it
hasn’t harmed the show.
 
So be like Elsa, and let it go.
 

 
I doubt anything in the Timeless Child is accurate!

Doubt what you like. RTD has already doubled down on it in his first four
episodes and cemented it in canon. So we’re all stuck with it, unless we go
the mentally unwell route and claim the show no longer exists even though
the BBC and Disney continue to produce and stream it, and millions of
viewers watch it.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor