Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
The True Doctor wrote:How can an abused child from another dimension that was turned into a monster possibly be the predecessor of Hartnell when the idea wasn't thought of until 2018?>Ah c'mon Aggy at least try and be serious. How can the face of a
Where's Doctor Ruth among the faces of the Doctor? She's not
there because there's no Doctor Ruth. The Doctor's
regenerations begin at Hartnell. Where's Ruth's before his
face? It's not there because all the faces after Hartnell are
those of Morbius, and Hartnell is declared as the beginning of
the Doctor, not Ruth.
woman from a 2020 episode of Doctor Who be featured in an
episode of Doctor Who from 1976 when the idea hadn't even been
thought of?
It's quite simple, read slowly if it helps. In 1976 a Doctor WhoFiction has to make sense in order to be believed. Where is the face of Doctor Ruth if she came directly before Hartnell according to Chibnall and Big Finish? The least Chibnall could have done is chosen a white male actor to play the Timeless Child monster if he claims it was one of the faces shown in The Brain of Morbius.
producer had an idea, forty plus years later another Doctor Who
producer had a different idea. It's all fiction at the end of
the day but expecting Phillip Hinchcliffe to know in 1976 whatStop being stupid. You're just as bad a Squealer. Chibnall knew what Hinchcliffe did in 1976 so why didn't he choose to subvert it?
Chris Chibnall was going to do in 2020 is not a rational
argument.
A sixty year old TV show contains layers, and each producer addsThere were no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell period. Proof is by contradiction. Either the unknown faces are those of Morbius, or one of them should be a fat black woman that is shown immediately after Hartnell's face. She isn't therefore there are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
different layers to a show's lore at different times. You
don't have to like it, but that's how it is.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.