Re: RTD tells us how he’s going to just move forward

On 05/05/2024 20:19, The Last Doctor wrote:

The Spammer <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <v18grd$1vts5$1@dont-email.me>,
The Loon<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

On 04/05/2024 18:26, The Last Doctor wrote:

At the premiere cinema showing of the opening of the new season, RTD had
this to say:
>
"I think The Timeless Child doesn’t mean anything to anyone, to a lot of
viewers. Genuinely, to a few outside the show – what does that mean? But
what it does mean is the Doctor’s an orphan, he was abandoned, he was
adopted by the Time Lords, so you play that for the emotions.

>
Oh yes, a child from another culture that was abducted, neglected, left
to die, experimented on, repeatedly murdered,

 Yep, there was definitely some pure evil done to that child by Tecteun. Of
course, we have no idea what anyone other than Tecteun actually knew about
that.
 

and turned into an agent
of evil, a mass murdering genocidal maniac.

 This, however, is just lunatic invention from Aggie. There is a narrative
in the show suggesting that the Doctor worked for a “Black Ops” Division of
Time Lord security. But no indication that the Doctor did anything
personally evil and absolutely not one word about the Doctor committing
even one murder, let alone being a genocidal maniac.
 

Wrong! The child murdering bitch planned to destroy the entire universe and exterminate all life in both that and the other universe she planned to concur along with the Timeless Child. It is clearly signposted that Timeless Child monster Ruth fled the Division after she grew a conscience and realized the immensity of her crimes. There is every indication that the Timeless Child monster colluded in murder and genocide even it it didn't carry it out itself, just like the Nazi concentration camp guards knew that crimes that were being carried out there but did nothing. The Timeless Child monster knew full well of the crimes of the Division that it willingly assisted by being part of it, which is why it fled.

>

"I don't want to hang things off science fiction words, that simply won't
mean anything around the breakfast table. But, if you're talking about a
family with a world in which people adopt children, or foster children, or
abandoned children, then suddenly it begins to register with you. So that's
our take on that.
"And that's going to have a lot of ammunition and fuel going forward.
Because it goes Millie as Ruby Sunday, she was abandoned as a family on the
church doorstep. So you have the Doctor and companion suddenly chiming with
their lives connecting."

>
I don't give a fuck about her or the child grooming pervert.

 Aggie is on some serious insane kick. Who is this “child grooming pervert”
he’s going on about? What evidence does he have that whoever this is, is a
“child grooming pervert”? Apart from those voices in his head?
 

We have every indiction from his manner of dress and behaviour that Gatwa is a child grooming pervert. What other kind of person would appear in a show called 'Sex Education'? Who does he think he is going to attract by dressing provocatively like a woman, because it isn't heterosexual adults. The only people this manner of dress could attract, appeal to or entice is children. Even gay men wouldn't find it attractive because gay men don't fancy women at all.

There's
nothing for the majority of people to identify with or aspire two in
either of those characters.

 Nothing positive about the Doctor? Nothing positive about an adopted child
who seems to have grown up into a healthy, happy young woman? Aggie doesn’t

Gatwa is an effeminate child grooming pervert. There is nothing positive about that in any way.
Why does the audience need to be told Gibson was adopted? All it does is exclude everyone who isn't from using her as a role model, because that's all that she stands from. She doesn't have any personal attributes defining who she is, it's all about what she is instead. This is how retards and bigots think. What you are, what race you are, what gender you are, what sexuality you are, not who you are, your intelligence, your demonstration of an ability or skill, your strength, and how you acquired these attributes and how you use them, why and what for.

seem to have a clue who he thinks he’s talking about, and certainly knows
nothing about “the majority of people”. He’s barely an expert on lunatic
racist middle aged incels who live in basement flats in Northampton, and
there’s no evidence that there’s more than ONE of them, let alone that they
are representative of “the majority of people”.
 

You are a totally deranged bigot and a retard.

Ruby should have been an ordinary person,
from an ordinary home, living an ordinary life, like everyone else.

 Why? In any case, this is pretty much what we are told about her, apart
from the oddity of how she was left and the goblins’ interest in her -
which is the cause of the Doctor’s interest in her.
 

All examples of bad writing where the female protagonist does nothing on her own merit. She's nothing more than a Mary Sue which is how woke retards write all female characters.

Then
her life changes from the ordinary when she meets the Doctor,

 Which is what she does.
 

She a Mary Sue so nothing changes for her. She's already perfect.

not a
child grooming pervert

 What “child grooming pervert”? This imaginary character Aggie keeps
bringing up is seriously interfering with his ability to make a genuine
argument.

Gatwa. See above.

 

and after undergoing new struggles and through a
heroic journey she learns new lessons and aspires to become someone
better than before.

 Maybe she will. Who knows? We’ve only seen her introductory meet-cute with
the Doctor.

The child grooming pervert RTD doesn't know how to write a heroic journey. He's not even writing for men but for women. Everything that attracted men to watch shows like Doctor Who has been removed by woke bigots like Chibnall and Davies. He's a degenerate woke soap opera writer. He wouldn't know a hero even if one shoved their cock up his arse, which of course a real hero would never do. If he does understand the principles of good writing he'd understand that the Timeless Child totally destroys and annihilates the heroic nature of the Doctor and turns him into a monster.

 

Gibson and Gatwa have shown us nothing about
learning, heroism, and wisdom. It's all nothing more than mind numbing
soap opera, bigoted left-wing lecturing, attempts to sexually groom
children, cartoon logic and magic instead of science, reason, and using
you mind to overcome adversity.

 I see Aggie has already written his “review” of eight episodes he hasn’t
seen yet (as well as the one he has seen but utterly failed to understand).

They're all going to be absolute crap given Davies's new and existing retarded comments.
https://boundingintocomics.com/2024/05/01/doctor-who-showrunner-confirms-upcoming-season-to-feature-heavy-focus-on-progressive-messaging-if-youre-not-writing-that-in-2024-what-on-earth-are-you-doing/

 

So - no retcon. RTD is basically going to ignore the Timeless Child per se,
but play on the idea of the Doctor being originally a foundling adopted by
the Time Lords. So it’s still there - but just as background motivation.
>
I can live with that.

>
Only if you condone systematic child abuse and murder.

 Being OK with moving on from a story that hasn’t even been told is
absolutely not the same as condoning the abuse that was done to the
Timeless Child.

Yes it is. The pervert RTD thinks it's fine to abuse children, murder, and experiment on them because that's how the fake Doctor was created and that's what he stands for.

 For all we know, Tecteun was arraigned by the Time Lords and imprisoned for
a million years, the Doctor was counselled and allowed to live a new life
in reparation, and other events we have seen have not been explained.
 

 From Flux we know she wasn't. All the Time Lords colluded with her. Not only did Chibnall destroy the character of the Doctor, he destroyed the character of the Time Lords as well.

But as it was all so badly done, I’d rather move on than revisit any of it.
 

It's impossible to move on until it is all erased, including all the bullshit about UNIT being created by a snake monster from an alien planet in the future, and the Cyber Lords bullshit, and now the Indian Isaac Newton and the Bi-generation crap.

Spot on AGA!

 Dave, look again. The only spot Aggie is on is the worn spot in the carpet
in the dunce’s corner of the slow learners’ class.
 

Yet another expression of your insanity and conflict with reality.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner