Re: Why Billie Piper Was Cast... [article]

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra drwho 
Sujet : Re: Why Billie Piper Was Cast... [article]
De : blueshirt (at) *nospam* indigo.news (Blueshirt)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho
Date : 06. Jun 2025, 13:47:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <xn0p6q6l18l7x25007@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
Daniel70 wrote:

On 6/06/2025 10:18 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 7:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
 
Big Finish gave Paul McGann plenty of stories, so
there's no point in going back to him. It's easier for
you to just put everything since 1996 down to a bad
dream from your point of view and go forward with the
16th Doctor
 
Surely that would then be "The New Ninth Doctor"!!
 
I thought we had established that numbers were boring and
we were going with BillieDoctor?
 
I've slowly been able to convert SOME of you to my way of
thinking .... but only recently. ;-P

The more Doctors we have, the more confusing it gets.

Especially when you get perverse people [like me] who want to
include Peter Cushing...

(Probably just for the fun of upsetting the people who take it
all so seriously and don't want to include him!)

Your system kind of works... to a degree. IF we adapted it a bit
and went with surnames though, it might just work properly; so
PiperDoc, TennantDoc, GatwaDoc, WhittakerDoc, (etc.)

Simples.

But then this "The New Ninth Doctor" hasn't happened YET so
how could I call Him/Her/It by any other name??

Don't hold your breath!
 
Please don't tell me you forgot THAT... after all, YOU
invented the system!
 
So why did YOU use the term "the 16th Doctor"?? Did YOU
forget??

Of course.

Your excuse of "old age" works for me too... ;-)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal