Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
On 2024-04-04 4:06 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:I'm guessing .... NO WAY!! .... because of all the mangled English Expression he posts!!The Doctor wrote on 4/4/24 12:32 am:If this is the lie:In article <uujifs$3tvfb$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65>
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:The Doctor wrote on 3/4/24 2:18 am:>In article <xn0ok3ksw98h0jr005@reader.xsnews.nl>, BlueshirtHe may be, asswipe, but can YOU, a%e, deny what Blueshirt typed, asswipe??
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:The Doctor wrote:>In article <uugivc$34ebv$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65>
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:>>
"Let HE that is without sin cast the first stone" ... or something like that!!
You for the Go and sin no more part!
No, Dave that's not how it works. Sin no more is not the way.
>
You can sin and repent, and sin and repent, as long as you say enough 'Our Fathers' and 'Hail Mary's' as your penance...
>
This is the way.
>
Hence the kiddie-fiddling priests can molest children, confess their sins, then repent and all is good, off to another parish they go. Rinse and repeat.
You are evil!!
>
The lie is not all preachers of the Word have paedophile tendencies!
So WHERE was that lie ever typed, asswipe?? EVER??
>
Blueshirt may just have been referencing the 1% of Religious Ministers
that .... "the kiddie-fiddling priests can molest children, confess
their sins, then repent and all is good, off to another parish they go.
Rinse and repeat."
>
Do try to keep up, asswipe!!
"The lie is not all preachers of the Word have paedophile tendencies!"
Then I guess all preachers of the Word have paedophile tendencies?
I wonder if the asswipe even reads what he posts? I know he doesn't think about his posts.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.