Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....)

On 2024-04-17 8:10 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

Idlehands wrote on 17/4/24 10:52 pm:

On 2024-04-17 1:02 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 16/04/2024 11:40 pm:

In article <uvli98$sr0a$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 16/4/24 12:31 am:

>
<Snip>
>

I wonder why Idlehands hides his true tendancies when He goes
to Church.

>
Sorry, asswipe!! How do YOU, asswipe, know what Idlehands' tendancies AT ANYTHING was/are, asswipe??

>
Where have you been red-beard?! We refer to Idlehands the
Paedophile!

>
I've been right here, asswipe, waiting for YOU, asswipe, to
actually answer any of out questions, asswipe!!
>
Sorry, asswipe!! How do YOU, asswipe, know what Idlehands'
tendancies AT ANYTHING was/are, asswipe??

>
First of all who is "we"?  The only asshole who calls me paedophile
is the asswipe.

>
And he's spread out who he calls 'Paedophile'!! Pretty soon, the whole world will be full of 'Paedophile'-type people!
>

Secondly the asswipe has never introduced proof that I am a
paedophile.

>
Of course not! I'm guessing such proof DOES NOT EXIST!!

 Of course it doesn't, as a father and grandfather it's damn offensive accusation and one day just might bite him in his flabby fat ass.
 

>

Nothing new there but he continues to push the line with
his bullshit.
>
Hey binky, has your "Church" ever accepted your offer to help with
VBS again?  Why would a single, never in a relationship, middle age
man, living in mummy's basement, want to work with young kids?
Besides the obvious?

>
Hey!! Added Bonus!! .... If he IS dealing with His Church's kids .... he'd have less time to BUG us!! ;-P
>
Oh!! But his High Power, hugely popular, ISP business might suffer!! ;-(

 I wouldn't let him near anyone's children due to his behaviour on Usenet and all the red flags his "lifestyle" generates.