Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
In article <xn0okyrzpi55cpz002@post.eweka.nl>,It's degenerate fan fiction created and written by someone who totally despised the entire show so decided to destroy everything in it.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:The Doctor wrote:The Timeless Child is Anti-doctorWho!
>In article <v09h5j$1th3u$1@dont-email.me>,>
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:>>>
Chibnall's revisions must be retconned!
As shown above, Chibnall’s Timeless Child narrative can be
made to be completely consistent with the entire history of
the show. It was crafted that way.
>
It’s awfully convoluted and contrived, and completely
unnecessary. But it hasn’t harmed the show.
>
So be like Elsa, and let it go.
I doubt anything in the Timeless Child is accurate!
How can it be inaccurate? The "Timeless Child" was created and
written by the Doctor Who Executive Producer and broadcast on
BBC1. You can't get anything more legitimate. Therefore it can't
be inaccurate and the Timeless Child has become part of Doctor
Who lore.
>
YOU may not like the idea. I may not like the idea. But it is
officially part of the show... and it's not likely to change
anytime soon. (Based on what we've seen from RTD so far.)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.