Re: From the Archives .....

On 2024-04-30 5:09 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

Blueshirt wrote on 30/4/24 12:03 am:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 28/04/2024 16:15, The Last Doctor wrote:

>
we can’t expect a 100% concordance with every tiny element
of the history of the show.

>
Yes we can. This is what a good writer will do not a writer of
shit who wants to totally destroy a show he despises so he can
get his retarded sexist and racist message across to the fans
saying that he hates and despises them for being normal.

>
Expecting a TV show that has been running 60 years to be 100%
consistent with itself is not a reasonable expectation.
>

Otherwise the show would have imploded the
second time Atlantis was destroyed.

>
The show already imploded. Whittaker lost 3/4 of the shows
viewers thanks to the Timeless Child monster and Tennant and
Gatwa have failed to get even half of them back.
>
Doctor Who is DEAD!

>
You do like a bit of hyperbole don't you?!
>
I'm looking forward to your reviews of those two new Doctor Who
episodes in twelve days time.
>

WHAT?? But, if 'Doctor Who' *IS* *DEAD* how could Aggy possible do a review of a *non-existant* show?? ;-P

Well he simply cuts and pastes "woke", "grooming", "garbage", "Plato" over and over and over again and then.....
0/10
Followed up with extolling his non-existent virtues as the master of science fiction and mouth piece for the majority of the world.
--
Facisim:  The first step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent
Bertrand Russell