Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
In article <3Us9O.73549$pKV2.40760@fx04.ams4>,and there it is , proved
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:On 6/9/2024 18:03, Blueshirt wrote:Go on! Prove it.The True Doctor wrote:>
>On 09/06/2024 22:32, Blueshirt wrote:>>
Stupid? Says a man who continually claims that a TV show
finished seven years ago
Which it did.
Does Disney know that? If not, then they just got ripped off by the
BBC. Perhaps you can send them a note.
>
Isn't it difficult for you to watch a show, and give reviews of said
show, if it ended seven years ago? Stop getting high on you own flatulence.
>>>
Exhibit A
>but has watched every single episode>
that has aired since then at the first opportunity he gets...
Not one single new episode of Doctor Who has aired since 2017.
And yet you have provided, and continue to provide, reviews of episodes
that were first broadcast and streamed /since/ 2017.
>
I've already told you, Aggy, that you need to stop with the flatulence
intoxication.
>
>>>
Exhibit B
and continues to talk about this show that has 'finished' and>
spend his time watching YouTube videos about this show that
has finished. <rolls eyes>
The YouTubers all agree with me. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
There you go again, Aggy, falling back on absolutes (all/everybody).
RADW has seen that spurious defense of yours, in various forms and
fashions, for at least the past 20 years...covering various topics where
you claim to be an "expert".
>
It's more you agree with them (more likely you cherry-pick whatever fits
your narrative and conveniently forget what they say that makes your
position even more untenable than it already is); there is no way on
God's Green Earth that you originated, "Doctor Who ended in 2017". When
you state, "The YouTubers all agree with me", you are implying that you
are the originator of the position, and others have decided to agree
with you after consideration of said position.
>>>
Exhibit C
>Methinks your understanding of what words mean is a little>
shaky. Maybe English isn't your first language? THAT would
explain a lot!!!
You don't understand anything, neither English nor Mathematics
as I have repeatedly proven.
This coming from Aggy, who fails to grasp the concept that spell
checkers do not check for, or correct grammatical errors.
Aggy, aren't you supposed to be some kind of college graduate?
>
>>>
The case for the prosecution rests.
I think you are proving to the readers of RADW, (well, the>
ones that haven't killfiled you) exactly what the word
stupid means!
That's what you're doing.
Blueshirt is doing no such thing. You are the one doing all the work
every time you post. All Blueshirt is doing is laying it all out in one
nice, neat, little package.
>
>>>
You're the one in most peoples' killfiles!
>
Even so, the remaining members of the RADW jury will now retire
to consider the case of 'stupidity' levelled against you...
>
Hey, Blueshirt. Considering the evidence against him, in addition to
stupidity, can we also consider "Delusions of Grandeur"?
>
-- >
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.