Re: Ratings Asphyxiation for Doctor Whoke

On 11/06/2024 01:24, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:
 

On 10/06/2024 23:08, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

>
Who cares? It didn't look like it to me.

>
I reckon the resolution on your monitor must be dodgy or
something, as you don't seem to see a lot of things!

>
What the fuck has it got to do with the resolution of my
monitor you retard? When did REG come in for a photo shoot?
The BBC have already got enough archive footage of him in HD
to do a deep fake

 Maybe you should get an eye test then, as nothing was faked.
That lovely crisp 4K UHD picture should give you plenty of
definition, so if you're not seeing stuff properly, Doctor
Blueshirt recommends a trip to Specsavers...

You are a totally insane retard.
2K or 4K doesn't change the fact that there was no photo shoot. The images of Hartnell, Troughton, and Pertwee looked just as sharp given that the radius of least confusion used in the film industry for 35mm film renders all footage filmed in 4K effectively no sharper than 2K since the lenses used can't produce a sharper image than 2K 4:4:4 resolution to begin with. With the rescaling that was present and use of 3D modelling even SD B/W footage of their faces would have looked as sharp as 4K.
Provide independent evidence otherwise or else shut the fuck up.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner