Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who Underworld
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 16. Jun 2024, 12:45:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4mfp7$tga$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 15/6/24 10:21 pm:
In article <v4j2e6$39trb$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 9:09 pm:
In article <v4efdo$26t0s$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 13/6/24 12:08 am:
I can provide a review of all four parts of "Doctor Who:
Underworld" based on the transcripts from the website you
provided. I'll focus on the narrative elements, character
development, and overall story progression to rate each part out
of 10.
>
Sorry!! WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website,
Gobble-de-gook??
>
Certainly not me!!
>
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/15-5.htm
>
That may or may not be the website YOU, Gobble-de-gook, used but I
didn't ASK for that, Gobble-de-gook, I asked *WHO* provided YOU,
Gobble-de-gook, with some website, Gobble-de-gook!!
How clueless are you Dannyboy?
Not very, Gobble-de-gook, cause I can tell when a question is asked of me .... and then, usually, provide a logical answer to said question, Gobble-de-gook.
WHO provided YOU, gobble-de-gook, with a website, Gobble-de-gook??
-- Daniel