Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
On 6/16/2024 16:21, Blueshirt wrote:Trying to explained statistics to the stupid is like flooding a dead horse.
Okay, George, let's take Doomcock's figures at face value...even though he himself said that they were unverifiable, and hasn't mentioned them since (he's only dealt with the UK numbers since...and as you know, those /are/ verified). First of all, the number was 50,000...but, hey, your cognitive skills have always been shown to be lacking. Also, those>>
We have a figure of 40,000 total viewers for the first 2
episodes on Disney+ from Doomcock and unless Disney+ publishes
figures which contradict that then Doomcock must be accepted
as the most accurate figure available.
numbers were for the US market only...aside from the UK and Ireland, Disney has the global distribution rights. Telling us that only 200 people worldwide are watching is even more laughable that claiming it'sDo you understand how streaming viewers are counted? 50,000 viewers does not mean that 50,000 people watched an episode all the way through. It means that 50,000 people watched for 10 seconds or more.
just the US numbers. But anyway....
If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the most accurate,Since they are the only numbers they must be the most accurate.
then that already destroys your position that there are only 200 people watching the show on Disney+, either US only, or globally. See how youOnce again teaching statistics to the stupid is like flogging a dead horse. If you want to claim the status of an expert then provide your credentials.
keep shooting down your own arguments? Of course, I completely expectStop proving yourself to be stupid.
you to try to move the goalposts (it's what you do) and tell us that 49,800 viewers have abandoned the show...and you can take nonsense, and your figure of 200 and stick them back up your arse where it came from; perhaps that will help you with that persistent flatulence problem. There is no way, none at all, that any show with US and/or global numbers as low as 200 stays on the air one second longer...it would get pulled faster than you can say, "Cop Rock". The amount of money alreadyTalking to the stupid about how streaming works is like flogging a dead horse. Didn't I mention that earlier.
spent is not relevant, the company would rather take the losses already incurred, and write them off, than continue to lose any more allowing the contract to continue to term. Don't tell us that it doesn't happen, because it has in the past, and continues to this day. A network/streaming service orders X number of episodes, and the show doesn't perform at the expected level, the show gets dropped right then and there; any remaining episodes already completed never see the light of day.Stop showing your total ineptitude. That's not how streaming words.
As much as I like Doomcock's channel, any Disney viewing numbers he has are unverified speculation...and he states as much.But they are the most accurate figures there are. If Disney claims otherwise then let them publish the true figures including average duration streamed. The whole average of everyone who watched for 10 seconds or more, not just the average duration of those who watched each episode all the way through from start to finish.
So, if you would like to be taken seriously, provide us with OFFICIAL viewing numbers from an OFFICIAL, VERIFIABLE source. Your arse does notNo one is taking you seriously because you don't understand the difference between watching for 10 seconds or more and watched an episode all the way through.
qualify.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.