Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
On 17/06/2024 00:38, Hornplayer9599 wrote:YEAH!! 'flooding' a dead horse *IS* pretty stupid!!On 6/16/2024 16:21, Blueshirt wrote:Trying to explained statistics to the stupid is like flooding a deadOkay, George, let's take Doomcock's figures at face value...even though he himself said that they were unverifiable, and hasn't mentioned them since (he's only dealt with the UK numbersWe have a figure of 40,000 total viewers for the first 2 episodes on Disney+ from Doomcock and unless Disney+ publishes figures which contradict that then Doomcock must be accepted as
the most accurate figure available.
since...and as you know, those /are/ verified). First of all, the
number was 50,000...but, hey, your cognitive skills have always
been shown to be lacking. Also, those
horse.
50,000 an 40,000 are both of the same order of magnitude. Do you understand orders of magnitude? So it makes little difference if theI'm guessing Disney might have just a tad more Market penetration than your little YouTube channel, Aggy.
estimate is 20% out. 40,000 is easier to do the maths when comparing
with my channel
numbers were for the US market only...aside from the UK andDo you understand how streaming viewers are counted? 50,000 viewers
Ireland, Disney has the global distribution rights. Telling us
that only 200 people worldwide are watching is even more laughable
that claiming it's just the US numbers. But anyway....
does not mean that 50,000 people watched an episode all the way
through. It means that 50,000 people watched for 10 seconds or more.
Based on comparison with other streaming services such as my YouTube
channel which has the same world wide distribution as Disney+ only
about 200 people at bast would have watched each episode all the way
through, ie. 1/3 of 600 which is the number of people who averaged 8
minutes out of 40,000 or 50,000.
But, if they are *ONLY* Doomcock's number, how do you determine their accuracy, Aggy??If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the mostSince they are the only numbers they must be the most accurate.
accurate,
So typing sensible words is a measure of stupidity, is it?? That must make you, Aggy, an expert in Stupidity!!then that already destroys your position that there are only 200 people watching the show on Disney+, either US only, or globally.Once again teaching statistics to the stupid is like flogging a dead
See how you
horse. If you want to claim the status of an expert then provide
your credentials.
200 is the number of people who watched each episode from start to finish. The rest only average about 20 seconds to 1 minute.
keep shooting down your own arguments? Of course, I completelyStop proving yourself to be stupid.
expect
Sorry!! Was this last paragraph posted by Aggy or Blueshirt/Hornplayer?? It seems like it was Blueshirt or Hornplayer .... but my Quotation levels seem to indicate it was Aggy!!you to try to move the goalposts (it's what you do) and tell usTalking to the stupid about how streaming works is like flogging a
that 49,800 viewers have abandoned the show...and you can take
nonsense, and your figure of 200 and stick them back up your arse
where it came from; perhaps that will help you with that persistent
flatulence problem. There is no way, none at all, that any show
with US and/or global numbers as low as 200 stays on the air one
second longer...it would get pulled faster than you can say, "Cop
Rock". The amount of money already
dead horse. Didn't I mention that earlier.
Disney you ignorant stupidity filled fool has ALREADY PAID
$200,000,000 or whatever RTD claimed to make 2 series of Doctor Who.
The money is already in the Bank of RTD and Bad Wolf Productions and
Disney ain't going to get any of it back.
Do you understand what a contract is, stupid?Ahh!! Now I know we're with Aggy!
Now do we need to talk about about dead horses?Well not about "flooding" them, anyway!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.