Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times.

The Doctor wrote on 18/06/2024 11:24 pm:

In article <uEfcO.13475$yMc7.4323@fx09.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599  <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:

On 6/18/2024 04:40, Daniel70 wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 17/6/24 11:00 pm:

In article <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The True Doctor Pangloss wrote:

On 17/06/2024 00:38, Hornplayer9599 wrote:

>
If you are telling us that Doomcock's numbers are the most
accurate,

>
Since they are the only numbers they must be the most
accurate.

>
Good of you to be so candid with us. Or do I mean ‘Candide’?
>
Either way, this best-of-all-possible-worlds optimism is an
interesting change from you.

>
I’ve done a quick * packet estimate for Disney+ based on iMDB
interactions for episode 7 in another thread. If we assume that
people rating 3 or more probably watched the episode, even if
people rating 1 or 2 didn’t, then to date Disney+ has racked up
about 2m viewers worldwide so far for The Legend of Ruby Sunday -
or about the same as the U.K.

>
Do not swear.

>
Dave, if you aren't adult enough to handle any swearing, the Dr. Who
moderated group is this way --------->

 No longer exists and the word in mention is a "Homophobic slur"

Bullshit, Gobble-de-gook, it still exists, indeed, I check in on it every time I come on line!!
I'm guessing .... Whoever WAS the Moderator has gone by the wayside, so no-one can post there!!

Buggered if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are the Moderator of this/these
Newsgroups, Gobble-de-gook, but, in any case ..... WHERE DID MIKE SWEAR,
Gobble-de-gook??

OH!! Gobble-de-gook, YOU omitted to answer the above question!!

>
Or are YOU, (the under-educated) Gobble-de-gook, confusing "fag" with
some naughty, naughty, word, Gobble-de-gook??--

Daniel