Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <v56pt9$3qekl$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <v56h06$3ooo8$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 22/6/24 8:40 am:

In article <v53u5e$367al$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

 
<Snip>
 

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things
are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them
that do them.

 
Exacellent!
 
Now quote Acts where it JEsus Says Paul is my servant.

 
Sorry!! Are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, now calling Jesus an 'it'??
 
And I very much doubt Jesus would have know Saul/Paul at all,
Gobble-de-gook, so Jesus would not have called Saul/Paul anything,
Gobble-de-gook.
 
Maybe YOU, Gobble-de-gook, should try *LISTENING* to YOUR preacher when
he is preaching to YOU, Gobble-de-gook!!

 
According to Luke the Evangelist (student of Paul and writer of the Gospel
of Luke - which used the earlier Gospel of Mark as the core of its
narrative - and of Acts, where this story is found), the spirit of Jesus
visited the apostle Ananias in a dream and sent him to cure Saul of Tarsus
of blindness because Saul was Jesus’ chosen instrument to spread the name
of Jesus to the Gentiles, their kings, and the Jews.
 
No one is saying that Paul did not believe himself to be a servant of
Jesus, or that Acts doesn’t claim that.
 
However that still doesn’t mean that words of Saul, later Paul, to the
Romans, about homosexual acts, were the words of Jesus. They were the words
of Paul.
 
Come on Dave. You said JESUS condemned homosexuals, not Paul. Where?

 
So if you link Acts 9 and Acts 13 , what do you get?
 
Or does logic elude you MM?

 
Since I made a 6 figure GBP salary last year performing a role heavily
dependent on the use of logic, I don’t think logic eludes me under normal
circumstances, no. I think it may be eluding you, as once again you are not
quoting a chapter and verse to support your claim, but instead are throwing
about random complete chapters of Acts, none of which contain any teachings
of Jesus directly as by this time he has retired from the Earth.
 
Since your claim is that Jesus condemned homosexuals, but the spirit of
Jesus only speaks to Saul and Ananias in Acts 9, and only to set Saul on
his path: and the only words attributed to Jesus in Acts 13 are what
Barnabas and Paul - at this time, some sort of double act - say he said:
(KJV) “I have set thee to be a light of the Gentiles, that thou shouldest
be for salvation unto the ends of the earth”, I’m not sure how that
supports your claim?
 

 
Give back all your money due to fraud.

I’m not going to take the word of a liar who continues to evade answering
all the questions asked of him and moving goalposts to try to hide from his
lies.

Hint: that’s you Dave. You have ONE WAY to prove you’re not a liar: provide
a chapter and verse quote from the Bible where Jesus (not anyone else,
Jesus) is said to condemn homosexuals.

Or you could recant and admit there is no such passage. That at least would
be honest.

My logic and reason are impeccable and I have stated only facts and
respected, almost universally accepted Biblical scholarship in support of
that logic.

You merely issue accusations, lies and irrelevancies, avoiding all
discussion of your false assertions. Even Aggie does better than that in
one sense - it’s just that all his assumptions, prejudices and conclusions
are deranged.

--
“Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.”  - The Doctor