Re: Cinema Ratings

On 07/07/2024 22:48, Blueshirt wrote:

Daniel70 wrote:
 

The True Doctor wrote on 7/7/24 2:19 am:

On 06/07/2024 09:09, solar penguin wrote:

>
Since you only trust random strangers on YouTube, try this:
>
https://youtu.be/IG40B9PbHe8
>
or this:
>
https://youtu.be/hC1HljB7-84
>
People who hated the episode when they saw it in the
cinema.

>
So if they hated it there can't have been many people there
with them. They probably all left before it ended if there
were any others there at all. But none of that matters as
you shall see below.
>

(And if you’re gonna claim they’re BBC plants, then why
didn’t they say they loved it?)

>
None of the people there count because the BBC paid to hire
the theatre so it counts as a full house even if not a
single viewer attended.
>
Do you seriously think the cinema managers counted everyone
actually sitting there through the whole performance and
sent the stats back to the BBC? It counts as a full house
because the BBC bought all the tickets even when completely
empty.

>
Do you seriously think the two guys (and their mates) that
Blueshirt posted links for WERE NOT ACTUALLY IN THE CINEMAS??

 They were SP's links actually, but your point still stands.
 

Bit hard to give reviews of programs they haven't actually
watched .....  Oh, but hang on, YOU, Aggy, are always doing
that, aren't you .... for our benefit, of course!!

 It's very easy to give reviews when you know in advance you are
going to rate an episode 0/10... or on a good day, 1/10!
 Aggy is so busy with his anti-everything agenda he even misses

Anti woke garbage agenda. If something is well written then I have nothing against it.

the sub plots of stories until it's pointed out to him! So
paying attention isn't Aggy's strong point. His reviews of
Doctor Who episodes are about as useful as a tray of bacon
sandwiches at a Bar Mitzvah!
 

Get an education you fool. I didn't miss any sub-plots. I deliberately chose not to reference them because I knew from the disgraceful quality of the writing that they would lead to absolutely nothing in the finale, and so they did. If you bothered to learn to understand literature then you would have figured that out too and not wasted your time on them.

Do you understand that this is how the statistics are always
all fiddled for publicity? The BBC have wasted licence fee
payers' money and should be condemned for it.

>
No, I thought YOU, Aggy, were supplying us with all the Stats
we needed!!

 If only Aggy did provide some proper stats! Or links to articles

If only the BBC and Disney+ would provide some proper stats. The onus is on them since they have the stats not me.

backing up his POV even... as opposed to guesses and made-up
nonsense that he got from people he worships on YouTube, who [on

In the business of science those are called estimates, predictions, and extrapolations.

the whole] don't have a clue what they are talking about but
love stirring up controversy as that's what makes income for
them for their YouTube channels.

They have more of a clue of what they are talking about than you, and understand literature and the principles of good story telling and story writing better than you do too.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner