Re: ChatGPt reviews Doctor Who - Warriors of the Deep

The Doctor wrote on 22/7/24 4:41 am:

In article <v7j4g7$474p$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 21/7/24 9:24 pm:

In article <v7inj2$23pq$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 21/7/24 12:45 am:

In article <v7gena$3i933$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

Blueshirt wrote on 20/7/24 7:05 am:

Dave-GPT wrote:

 Overall Rating and Final Thoughts
 "Warriors of the Deep" is a compelling story that
revisits classic foes and explores themes of war,
mistrust, and the cost of conflict.  The underwater
setting of Sea Base 4 adds a unique and atmospheric
backdrop to the narrative. Here are the individual and
overall ratings:
 Part One: 7.5/10 Part Two: 7/10 Part Three: 7.5/10
Part Four: 8/10
 Overall Rating: 7.5/10

 That could only be an AI generated review anyway, as no normal person would rate "Warriors of the Deep" that
highly!

 Correct! The clue was in the first word of the 'review'
... "Certainly' ... implying that there were two
identities involved in the production of the review ....
 1. Gobble-de-gook issued some 'instructions, and,
 2. The AI entity produced what Gobble-de-gook posted!!
 But Gobble-de-gook is too DUMB to even edit "His" post
BEFORE posting.

 Why edit when you have to produce the said evidence?

 BUT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are NOT producing this garbage, Gobble-de-gook!!
 

You would not make a good police officer.

 Good enough to identify that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are a thief for claiming YOU, Gobble-de-gook, produce this S*T!!

 And you pull a cut-and-lie Dannyboy!

 It's all still "Out There", Gobble-de-gook, if only YOU,
Gobble-de-gook, knew how to do it!!

 But cutting 80% of the context is close to a lie.
 

That's a *LIE* , Gobble-de-gook, I very much doubt that I have EVER cut anywhere near 80% of the post to which I am responding .... but, then, many would claim that I don't cut enough cause they believe that if you aren't responding to some part of a post YOU SHOULD CUT THAT PORTION OUT. So some might (RIGHTLY) claim that I don't cut enough.
Just because that might make it more difficult for YOU, Gobble-de-gook, is NOT my FAULT or my PROBLEM, Gobble-de-gook. Perhaps if YOU, Gobble-de-gook, learned how to set YOUR antiquated News Reader to view posts in a THREADED manor, perhaps every one here would have a better time here.
But how many times do those here need to tell YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that?? .... Do numbers go that high??
--
Daniel