Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
In article <v80035$2qagn$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70Don't take MY word for the content, Gobble-de-gook, look it up YOURSELF!!
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:The Doctor wrote on 25/7/24 10:48 pm:And what did it say?In article <v7te4a$2925n$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:Oh!! Didn't I, Gobble-de-gook??The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 11:53 pm:You did not look up the original article yurself Dannyboy!In article <wR6oO.320650$zXH9.253856@fx01.ams4>,<Snip>
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:On 7/24/2024 05:07, Daniel70 wrote:The Doctor wrote on 24/7/24 12:08 am:
I CAN'T HEAR YOU, Gobble-de-gook, so I've got ZERO idea whatAs i said, dannyboy is too lazy.He can't do that. Remember, Gobble-de-gook is incapableSO where is the original article?Go back up-thread and YOU'LL find the link,
Gobble-de-gook!
of setting up his newsreader to thread posts. That's why
he never trims his replies to only include the relevant
text...it's the only way he can see the conversation.
YOU, Gobble-de-gook, said!!
And WHY does it matter if I am lazy (or NOT) when it is YOU, Gobble-de-gook, that wants to look something or other up??
I think I actually did, Gobble-de-gook, ABOUT A WEEK AGO, when
Blueshirt posted the original post, Gobble-de-gook!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.