Sujet : Re: ChatGPT reviews Doctor Who The Twin Dilemma
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 26. Jul 2024, 15:04:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v80ade$2s2br$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 10:04 pm:
In article <v8012j$2qdcg$4@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 26/7/24 7:38 am:
In article <xn0ooqxhwbha1a1000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
>
Certainly! Here is a review of all four parts
of "Doctor Who: The Twin Dilemma" based on the transcript
from the website you provided. I'll evaluate each part
in terms of narrative, character development, pacing,
and overall impact to rate them out of 10.
>
Overall Rating and Final Thoughts
>
"The Twin Dilemma" is a controversial and challenging
introduction to the Sixth Doctor, marked by his unstable
post-regeneration behaviour and abrasive personality. While
the story itself has intriguing elements and some emotional
depth, the uneven pacing and off-putting characterisation of
the Doctor detract from the overall experience. Here are the
individual and overall ratings:
>
Part One: 6/10
Part Two: 6.5/10
Part Three: 7/10
Part Four: 7/10
>
Overall Rating: 6.625/10
>
WTF? !!!
>
Anyone rating this story above 1/10 deserves to win the
"Agamemnon Statistical Misrepresentation Award 2024" !
>
You and I concur!
>
YOU never were a Maths Whiz, were YOU, Gobble-de-gook!!
>
6.625 is WAAAAYYY above 1/10, Gobble-de-gook.
Do you recall how terrbile Twin Dilemma was?
Do YOU recall how SHIT YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are at Maths??
-- Daniel