Re: [article] Doctor Who: Has the Disney Gamble Paid Off?

The Doctor wrote on 30/7/24 11:35 pm:

In article <v8ac3h$vmte$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 30/7/24 3:08 pm:

In article <iTXpO.416688$7xg2.6271@fx14.ams4>, Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:

On 7/29/2024 11:58, Blueshirt wrote:

solar penguin wrote:

The idiot insisted:

In article <xn0oow9tjgti633001@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

 Science 1 Bible 0

 Wrongo boyo!  Science is sunbject to the bible.

 In that case, please show us where in the Bible we can
find Newton’s Second Law of Motion and the chemical
formula for ammonia.

 Stop! Dave was repeatedly asked by people here to provide a chapter/verse to back-up one of his infamous biblical claims
a couple of months ago. We are still waiting for the
relevant reference point. That man hasn't a clue about the
bible.
 I know more about his bible than he does and I'm a Atheist!

 And the more I hear Dave misquote, and misrepresent what is actually in the Bible (and WHERE in the Bible things are), the
more I'm convinced that he's one of these self-ordained
nutcases who really doesn't know the Bible, and just warps
scripture in any shape he needs it to be in in order to suit
his needs at the moment; that's why he can't defend what he
says, and tries to deflect and change the subject.  As a
Christian, that irritates me.

 So which is your version of the Holy bible?
 I chhose the KJV.

 Why should it matter WHAT Version of The Bible one uses,
Gobble-de-gook??
 The basic message should be the same IN EVER VERSION OF THE
BIBLE!!

 Then you know nothing about the Satanic counterfeits of the Holy Bible and Revised versions.

Yeap .... and, as the King James Version ONLY came into existance thanks to King James, IT must be one of those "Satanic counterfeits' RIGHT, Gobble-de-gook??
--
Daniel