Sujet : Re: Should we bring back RADWM?
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 13. Aug 2024, 02:28:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9ecra$3icdq$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 13/8/24 12:27 am:
In article <v9cmj9$38cfb$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
The Doctor wrote on 12/8/24 8:56 am:
In article <4Z9uO.158819$rto8.8115@fx05.ams4>, Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
<Snip>
Yes...it is what is known as a "judgement call", and it is
more efficient for the individual to employ their own
judgement regarding the appropriateness of the posting
behaviors of others, and if they deserve to be filtered out.
If one misses a valid point by a killfiled poster, that is a
risk one does take, but if the sound-to-noise ratio improves
dramatically for the reader from the decision to filter
someone, then has the individual really lost anything?
That is why killfiles are useless.
Gobble-de-gook DID you actually READ Hornplayer's post (i.e. the
one to which YOU responded!!) ..... cause it seems to be saying the
opposite to what YOU think, Gobble-de-gook.
IMHO, of course.
And your logic concludes?
Is that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are incorrect .... as usual!!
-- Daniel
Should we bring back RADWM?
Re: Should we bring back RADWM?
