Sujet : Re: Google Gemni reviews Doctor Who - Warriors of the Deep
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 23. Aug 2024, 10:16:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <va9k0i$s2ei$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
The Doctor wrote on 22/8/24 10:52 pm:
In article <va74q0$dgmu$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
In article <va56ce$3uh1v$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The idiot insisted:
Warrior's of the Deep is a standout story in the Sixth
Doctor's era. It's a thrilling underwater adventure with
strong characters, a compelling plot, and a visually stunning
setting.
And yet somehow the AI LLM still makes more sense than your own
posts.
Come On! Birdie! The error is obvious.
Which one? There are several errors:
‘Warriors of the Deep’ isn’t a standout story. It isn’t
from the Sixth Doctor’s era. It isn’t a thrilling underwater
adventure. It doesn’t have strong characters. It doesn’t have a
compelling plot. It doesn’t have a visually stunning setting. And
it doesn’t even have an apostrophe.
Warriors of the Deep involve The Doctor, Turlough and Tegan for
starters.
So WHAT?? Just because the story contains The Doctor, Turlough and Tegan It HAS to be a good story?? REALLY??
-- Daniel