Re: From the Archives.....

The Doctor wrote on 9/9/24 11:25 pm:

In article <vbmihb$2cha8$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

solar penguin wrote on 8/9/24 10:28 pm:

The ignored another inquiry:

In article <vbk494$1trc0$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The idiot instructed me:

In article <vbjub8$1t1j5$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The idiot ignored my inquiry:

In article <vbhvg8$1egnp$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The idiot insisted:

In article <vbhpb9$1djpi$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

>
You couldn’t foll him if your life depended on it!

>
Depends birdie!

>
Depends on _what_?

>
Idlehands is most deceived poster on Usenet.
>
% has 100x more intelligence than Idlehands.

>
That doesn’t answer my question. What does your ability to
‘foll’ people depend on?

>
Please read again Birdie.

>
OK.
>
(*reads again*)
>
No, it still doesn’t answer my question.
>
Start at the beginning. One step at a time. Describe how you
would foll someone, then go on to explain all the things it
depends on.
>
Does that make it easier for you?

>
Already done above.

>
Liar! Nowhere above do you describe folling, one step at a time!
>

I'm with you, Solar Penguin. NOWHERE has Gobble-de-gook bothered to
explain what HE thinks HE means by HIS use of the word 'foll'!!

 How illiterate are you 2?

Well, I'm literate enough to know that YOU, Gobble-de-gook, have yet to explain what the hell YOU, Gobble-de-gook, meant by YOUR usage of the word "foll", Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel