Re: USA Election

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra drwho 
Sujet : Re: USA Election
De : agamemnon (at) *nospam* hello.to.NO_SPAM (The True Doctor)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho
Date : 09. Nov 2024, 20:34:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
 
On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:
 
>
So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like
you and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
>
Yes it was. Totally fake news.
 How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here
since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining
about it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be
sacked!
 
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake news.

Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.
 
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.

(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)
 
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery in Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood against.

Everyone has the right to be against a female Doctor from the
beginning.
  Correct. It's the pretending - like Dave does - that it is the
Timeless Child that was the issue. He is a woman hating
It's not pretending. It's a fact. Whittaker and Gatwa could both
have been put up with until they were sacked. The Timeless Child monster totally destroyed Doctor Who. The Doctor is not an kidnapped abused child from another dimension that was repeatedly experimented on and murdered, kept changing race and gender for no reason whatsoever, and then was turned into a genocidal killer, then fled because of its crimes, was caught and had it's memory erased before being turned into William Hartnell as a boy.

Christian fundamentalist, he didn't approve of Jodie Whittaker
or her 13th Doctor from day one... the Timeless Child had
He doesn't hate women. When did he ever complain about any of the female companions? Whittaker was a terrible choice of actor to play the Doctor. Everyone with any common sense knows that.

nothing whatsoever to do with it. (Which is where this
incarnation of the discussion started.)
 
The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster cannot be tolerated.

That was my point, so why try and make out otherwise? It had
nothing to do with Jodie's first episode or the Timeless
Child arc.
>
You totally deranged and lunatic point was that everyone
should have ignored all the facts and agreed with your stupid
uninformed and ignorant opinion, propaganda and lies.
 That's your rebuttal is it? Nice one. My point is the
revisionist smoke-screen some fans like to put up to make it
seem that they are not misogynists and there were in-universe
reasons for not liking the 13th Doctor. (Dave still won't even
You are the revisionist. Not liking your favourite character gender swapped for a stupid woke gimmick is not misogynistic. It's pure common sensed.

refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th
Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda
or a lie.
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.

 Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are
[reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.
 
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or would agree with.

I was pointing out your bullshit and revisionism. Not liking
the Timeless Child is fine... I didn't like it much either.
>
You are the one who posted bullshit and revisionism. No one is
obliged to accept your retarded woke views and accept a female
Doctor before they have proven themselves.
 BUT, you wanted Chris Chibnall sacked the day after Jodie
Whittaker was cast... how is that giving Whittaker or Chibnall a
chance?
Turning the Doctor who is a MALE CHARACTER into a woman was a totally stupid and illogical idea. Of course Chibnall deserved to be sacked and eventually he was, but it was too late because he had already destroyed Doctor Who with the Timeless Child monster. Whittaker was give a chance to prove herself and she failed. Everyone with any sense knew she was a terrible actress. Only Joanna Lumley could have played the role, but only after Tom Baker, not after 13 previous male incarnations.

 
As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting
from day one just because she was a woman.
>
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.
 In your opinion.
 
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion. The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the manner of a man. That makes him a male character.

entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because
Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the
eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical
revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.
>
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.
 Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't
give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are
just confounded lies.
She was given a chance and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean you have to agree with them. It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Nov 24 * Re: USA Election240solar penguin
6 Nov 24 +- Re: USA Election1Blueshirt
7 Nov 24 +* Re: USA Election232The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 i+* Re: USA Election19The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 ii+- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 ii+* Re: USA Election3solar penguin
8 Nov 24 iii`* Re: USA Election2Your Name
9 Nov 24 iii `- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
9 Nov 24 ii`* Re: USA Election14Daniel70
16 Nov 24 ii `* Re: USA Election13Your Name
16 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: USA Election12Your Name
16 Nov 24 ii   +* Re: USA Election9Daniel70
16 Nov 24 ii   i+* Re: USA Election4solar penguin
16 Nov 24 ii   ii`* Re: USA Election3solar penguin
17 Nov 24 ii   ii +- Re: USA Election1Blueshirt
17 Nov 24 ii   ii `- Re: USA Election1Blueshirt
16 Nov 24 ii   i`* Re: USA Election4Your Name
17 Nov 24 ii   i `* Re: USA Election3Your Name
17 Nov 24 ii   i  `* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
17 Nov 24 ii   i   `- Re: USA Election1Blueshirt
16 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: USA Election2solar penguin
16 Nov 24 ii    `- Re: USA Election1Your Name
8 Nov 24 i+* Re: USA Election202The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 ii`* Re: USA Election201The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 ii `* Re: USA Election200The True Doctor
9 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: USA Election199The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   +* Re: USA Election54Daniel70
10 Nov 24 ii   i+* Re: USA Election3The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   ii+- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   ii`- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   i+* Re: USA Election10The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   ii`* Re: USA Election9The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   ii +* Re: USA Election5The True Doctor
10 Nov 24 ii   ii i`* Re: USA Election4solar penguin
11 Nov 24 ii   ii i `* Re: USA Election3The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii   ii i  `* Re: USA Election2solar penguin
11 Nov 24 ii   ii i   `- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii   ii +* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
11 Nov 24 ii   ii i`- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii   ii `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
10 Nov 24 ii   i+- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii   i`* Re: USA Election39Your Name
11 Nov 24 ii   i +* Re: USA Election4The True Doctor
12 Nov 24 ii   i i`* Re: USA Election3solar penguin
12 Nov 24 ii   i i +- Re: USA Election1Blueshirt
13 Nov 24 ii   i i `- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii   i `* Re: USA Election34Your Name
12 Nov 24 ii   i  +- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
17 Nov 24 ii   i  `* Re: USA Election32The True Doctor
17 Nov 24 ii   i   +* Re: USA Election24Blueshirt
17 Nov 24 ii   i   i+* Re: USA Election22The True Doctor
17 Nov 24 ii   i   ii`* Re: USA Election21The True Doctor
18 Nov 24 ii   i   ii `* Re: USA Election20The True Doctor
18 Nov 24 ii   i   ii  `* Re: USA Election19Daniel70
19 Nov 24 ii   i   ii   `* Re: USA Election18Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii    `* Re: USA Election17Your Name
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     +* Re: USA Election13Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i+* Re: USA Election2Your Name
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     ii`- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i+* Re: USA Election2Your Name
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     ii`- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i+* Re: USA Election5Daniel70
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     ii+* Re: USA Election3Daniel70
22 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     iii`* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
22 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     iii `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
22 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     ii`- Re: USA Election1Your Name
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i`* Re: USA Election3Your Name
22 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i `* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
22 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     i  `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii     `* Re: USA Election3Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i   ii      `* Re: USA Election2Your Name
21 Nov 24 ii   i   ii       `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
18 Nov 24 ii   i   i`- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
18 Nov 24 ii   i   `* Re: USA Election7Daniel70
19 Nov 24 ii   i    +* Re: USA Election3The Last Doctor
19 Nov 24 ii   i    i`* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
19 Nov 24 ii   i    i `- Re: USA Election1The Last Doctor
19 Nov 24 ii   i    `* Re: USA Election3Daniel70
19 Nov 24 ii   i     `* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
20 Nov 24 ii   i      `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
10 Nov 24 ii   +* Re: USA Election2Daniel70
11 Nov 24 ii   i`- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
10 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: USA Election142The True Doctor
11 Nov 24 ii    `* Re: USA Election141Daniel70
11 Nov 24 ii     +* Re: USA Election12The True Doctor
12 Nov 24 ii     i`* Re: USA Election11Daniel70
12 Nov 24 ii     i `* Re: USA Election10The True Doctor
13 Nov 24 ii     i  `* Re: USA Election9Daniel70
13 Nov 24 ii     i   +* Re: USA Election7The True Doctor
14 Nov 24 ii     i   i+* Re: USA Election3The True Doctor
14 Nov 24 ii     i   ii`* Re: USA Election2%
14 Nov 24 ii     i   ii `- Re: USA Election1%
14 Nov 24 ii     i   i`* Re: USA Election3Daniel70
14 Nov 24 ii     i   i +- Re: USA Election1The True Doctor
14 Nov 24 ii     i   i `- Re: USA Election1Your Name
14 Nov 24 ii     i   `- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
12 Nov 24 ii     `* Re: USA Election128The True Doctor
12 Nov 24 ii      +- Re: USA Election1solar penguin
12 Nov 24 ii      +* Re: USA Election84Daniel70
12 Nov 24 ii      i`* Re: USA Election83Blueshirt
13 Nov 24 ii      i `* Re: USA Election82Idlehands
12 Nov 24 ii      `* Re: USA Election42The True Doctor
9 Nov 24 i`* Re: USA Election10The True Doctor
8 Nov 24 +- Re: USA Election1Your Name
12 Nov 24 +* Re: USA Election2Your Name
19 Nov 24 +- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
20 Nov 24 +- Re: USA Election1Daniel70
20 Nov 24 `- Re: USA Election1solar penguin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal