Re: USA Election

On 10/11/2024 10:09, Daniel70 wrote:

The True Doctor wrote on 10/11/24 6:34 am:

On 09/11/2024 12:01, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 08/11/2024 20:30, Blueshirt wrote:

>

So what I said wasn't fake news then, was it? People, like you and Dave, were against a female Doctor from the beginning.

>
Yes it was. Totally fake news.

>
How can it be fake when both of you were posting messages here since the day Jodie was cast as the 13th Doctor complaining about it? In your case, even saying Chris Chibnall should be sacked!

>
Most Doctor Who fans thought the same way. Saying otherwise is fake news.

 Sorry! How did "Most Doctor Who fans" know how well the Chibnall/Jodie
combination was going to work BEFORE ANY SCRIPTS HAD BEEN SUBMITTED let
alone anything having been filmed??
 

The mere announcement that the Doctor had been turned into a woman for a woke gimmick was enough to figure out it was going to fail.

Or, maybe you believe in alternative facts? In which case, you
lose the argument for being an idiot.

>
There are no alternative facts. Almost everyone thought gender swapping the Doctor was a stupid gimmick that would fail.

 "no alternative facts" cause nothing had been written let alone filmed!!
 

The mere announcement that the Doctor, A MALE CHARACTER, had been turned into a woman for a woke gimmick was enough to figure out it was going to fail.

(As an aside, reading your old rants I wonder why you are even
here as you come across more like someone who is an anti-Doctor
Who... even Steven Moffat didn't escape your wrath.)

>
I supported Moffat until he went woke. There is no place for wokery in Doctor Who or anywhere. It's fascist Marxist totalitarian thought control. Doctor Who ended in 2017 when it became everything it stood against.

 Hang on .... you supported "Moffat until he went woke" ..... so this *IS
BEFORE* Chibnall/Jodie had come into existance!!
 

No one is claiming that Doctor Who only went woke when Chibnall took over. Doctor Who went woke the moment Moffat turned the Master into Missy and insulted the memory of the Brigadier and Nicolas Courtney who played him.

The Timeless Child monster has everything to do with it. Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked. The Timeless Child monster
cannot be tolerated.

 If "Whittaker was tolerated until she was sacked" how come, you, AGGY,
hated her 'Doctor Who' character since BEFORE it was ON SCREEN??
 

Tolerating her does not imply that I cannot hate her terrible acting and the terrible writing.

What's the saying .... "Doctor Who ceased in 2017!!".
 

refer to the 13th Doctor!) Some people in fandom wanted the 13th Doctor to fail from the very beginning, this is not propaganda or
a lie.

>
They knew she would fail from the very start. Nothing to do with wanting. It was a stupid gimmick.

 So why did "THEY" do it??
 

Can you read? I just told you. It was a stupid woke gimmick.
Chibnall and other woke retards like RTD don't care about the audience or good writing. They only thing they care about is their disgusting, degenerate woke agenda and using what they produce to sexually groom children.

Your rants here were quite predictable though and you are [reasonably] consistent, I will give you that.

>
My rants were reasonable common sense which the majority agreed or would agree with.

 Except they don't ..... at least not HERE!!
 

Wrong.

As I said, some people were against Jodie Whittaker's casting from day one just because she was a woman.

>
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be
played by a woman.

>
In your opinion.

>
This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.

 In how many instances has a Literary character changed sex before?? Did
Ian Fleming's James Bond suddenly become Jane Bond between books??
 

What the hell is that word salad supposed to mean Kamala?
The Doctor is a MALE character. A male character cannot be played by a woman. This is an absolute literary FACT not an opinion.

The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the
manner of a man. That makes him a male character.

 One could hardly describe 'The Doctor' as a "Man of Action'. Sure, The
Doctor MAKES THINGS HAPPEN .... but not from MALE STRENGTH!!
 

Wrong again. All you need to do is look at Jon Pertwee for proof by contradiction.
The Doctor is written acts, thinks, speaks, and behaves in the manner of a man. That makes him a male character.

entitled to their views but trying to pretend it was because Jodie didn't play the character well or it was because of the eventuality that became the Timeless Child is historical revisionism, aka BULLSHIT.

>
Your claims are historical revisionism, They facts show that
over 10 million viewers gave Whittaker a chance.

>
Judging by your posts here, and replies to others, you didn't give her much of a chance. Any claims otherwise by you are just confounded lies.

>
She was given a chance

 By WHOM?? YOU had canned her before even a scene was shot!!
 

By over 10 million viewers.

and she failed to prove herself. Giving someone a chance doesn't mean
you have to agree with them.

 Correct!! So WE don't HAVE to agree with YOU!!
 

It means they have to prove you wrong. They didn't.

 But, according to many, Jodie had failed before WE had even seen a
single scene!!

She failed from the moment she was cast because the Doctor is a MALE character and therefore cannot be portrayed by a woman. Whittaker was given a chance to disprove that SCIENTIFIC AND LITERARY FACT and she couldn't.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner