Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
The Doctor wrote:No offence but that should read "not all of us are imbeciles here", it's more honest in many ways.
In article <xn0otw3ig2p9qi0000@post.eweka.nl>,Dave, we don't need a stats post. We are not imbeciles. Anyone
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:Daniel70 wrote:>
>Blueshirt wrote on 29/11/24 1:09 am:>
>
<Snip>
>It would be like us running a poll here on RADW among the"twenty-five"?? Did you fail counting at pre-school,
twenty-five people and claiming that the result was
representative of all Doctor Who fans.
>
Blueshirt?? ;-P Or do you KNOW there are heaps of 'lurkers'
here-abouts??
FWIW, I know of at least two people that do lurk... and
there's one more that [says he] refuses to read the group
whilst The Doctor is posting here but he is on Usenet.. for
Doctor Who binaries. So, <shrugs>
>
But you know me, I like to be generous so by saying
twenty-five I am covering all my bases. We wouldn't want the
stats Professor and his accomplice to be jumping down my
throat and accusing me of FAKE NEWS, would we?
WEll, let's see what the 2024 numbers are like.
who visits RADW can count the different number of regular
posters here...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.