Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra drwho |
In article <xn0ou773e17c4od004@post.eweka.nl>,How would YOU, Gobble-de-gook, know .... I mean YOU, Gobble0de-gook, haven't seen it yet, have YOU, Gobble-de-gook??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:The Doctor wrote:Still as bad as the las air colourised version.In article <viq202$101k3$1@dont-email.me>,>
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:Hope and trepidation for "The War Games in Colour".>
>
Hope - that the colourisation is sympathetic and there
aren't too many bright blue floors.
>
Hope - that the story can fit satisfyingly into 90 minutes
(I think 120 might do it, 150 (as two 75s) would be better.
230 minutes down to 90 is drastic cutting - even the worst
serials didn't have THAT much padding.
>
Hope - that any found footage (as advertised) is meaningful.
A few seconds of Pat clowning here and there would be
pointless.
>
Trepidation - that the "new effects" and any visual changes
(to the offered faces, for example) might spoil the charm of
the story or seem out of place.
>
Trepidation - about the "regeneration scene" from Pat to
Jon. Still, at least that will shut down the "Fugitive
Doctor wasn't before Hartnell" crowd, at least the sane ones.
>
I wasn't keen on the trailer for "Joy to the World", though.
I hope it's better than it looks like it might be.
250 minutes the original.
Yes Dave, we all know that.
>
This is a new edited version of "The War Games", in colour...to
sit alongside the original. Not replace it!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.