Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 28. Jan 2025, 11:42:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnacau$1pagn$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 28/01/2025 3:57 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <RI5rq+AbS7lnFw9i@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <vn7pvm$q85p$4@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> writes
On 27/01/2025 2:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
Just finished watching a three/four part Doce series on the
life of Agatha Christie.
I've seen a few over the years, the BBC did one a few years ago
with Lucy Worsley ... which was only okay.
>
Lucy! That's the one! I liked her. Except her Lisp.
>
I don't mind her lisp, but I do find her presenting style rather
annoying, especially her pretence in her history documentaries that she
is letting us into secrets that she's only just unearthed and that
nobody else knows.
WEll ...
WEll .... WHAT, Binky??
-- Daniel70
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!