Sujet : Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwhoDate : 30. Jan 2025, 11:32:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnfkfa$2ta26$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 30/01/2025 2:29 pm, % wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <TuOcnQo7EKlhJgf6nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xaudneLEM8JhMQf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <t_idnRbjR5tLNgf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
its time for the stats
>
Well ...
>
well i can't do it
>
End of month comes within 72 hurs.
>
the stats won't change now
>
Oh?
>
you'll win i'll be second but that means i really win so i win
Ah!! So THAT'S your logic ..... Binky might post the most but Binky doesn't count so you WIN!!
Makes sense to me!!
-- Daniel70
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!
Re: Why WAS the 6th Doctor era SO BAD?!