Sujet : Re: For Binky ... Bible Studies
De : mike (at) *nospam* xenocyte.com (The Last Doctor)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 04. Mar 2025, 16:19:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : PhoNews/3.13.3 (Android/14)
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
>
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
>
Allegedly.
>
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of King David. Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent in the
Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary through
divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to Mary (NOT
Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is no evidence that
Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special about
being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand years earlier.
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that it's
almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish grandparents to
NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
-- There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish sometimes.