Re: Doctor Who Ratings CRASH OUT AGAIN With "Lucky Day" Hitting INSANE LOWS!

The True loon told lots more lies:

On 09/05/2025 15:38, solar imbecile wrote:

 
The True Doctor wrote:
 

On 08/05/2025 10:32, Blueshirt wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

 
Moreso RTD for preserving the Timeless Child.

 
Which the general TV watching public couldn't actually give a
damn about... only a few obsessive types want to keep banging

 
Wrong! Turning the main protagonist into a genocidal monster that is
running way from its crimes is what drove the general audience away.
 

 
Liar! As you’ve been told before, there was nothing in any episode
showing the pre-Hartnell Doctors being genocidal. They did bad

 
You are the liar. There are no pre-Hartnell Doctors.

There aren’t any post-Hartnell Doctors either. Or any Hartnell Doctors
if it comes to that. It’s all just fiction. None of it is real.

 
Jo Martin is shown running away from her crimes carrying a huge gun and
being captured by the Time Lords.

Yes, she’s committed crimes, according to Time Lord law. That
doesn’t mean those crimes were genocide. There are other, less
severe, crimes she could’ve committed. Such as interference.

Or do you think the Second Doctor committed genocide in The
War Games?

 
Jodie Whittaker is shown refusing to open the pocket-watch and recognise
the enormity of the crimes against all lifeforms the Timeless Child
monster either personally carried out, was an accomplice too, or watch
and did nothing to stop. This makes the Timeless Child monster no
different to the concentration camp guards at Auschwitz.
 

It certainly shows that the Doctor is worried about what she
might’ve done. But as she doesn’t know (and neither do we)
It’s impossible to say if her worries are justified.

It’s odd. For someone who claims to admire ancient philosophers
and right-wing politicians, you haven’t learnt from either Plato
or Donald Rumsfeld the importance of knowing that there are
things that we know we don’t know.

things, yes, but not necessarily genocide. That’s just something you
made up.
 

It was shown that the child abusing murdering bitch Tekteun wanted to
carry out genocide in the other universe after she had exhausted her
genocidal crimes in this universe and was prepared to exterminate
everyone in this universe in order to get to commit genocide in the
other. She was singled out as a perpetrator of genocides on a universal
lever and the Timeless Child monster was depicted by her as her willing
accomplice.

Liar! The Doctor was not her willing accomplice. She was actually
appalled by what Tecteun was doing.

 
If its crimes were trivial what doesn't Whittaker open the pocket-watch?

Because Whittaker is just an actress who isn’t even playing the
Doctor any more. And had to follow the script when she was.

Like I told you, it’s not real. Try to remember that.

 
If she believes she is not going to turn into a monster, why doesn't she
open the watch?

Because she just plain doesn’t know.

But that doesn’t mean she thinks it’ll be genocide. Remember, the
flashback in Once, Upon Time suggested that the Doctor might’ve
been an assassin. That’s bad enough without adding genocide!

 
Why does Whittaker let the two genociders on Ranskoor Av Kolos go free
instead of putting them on trial?

Because that’s what the script told her to do! Yes, it was a
badly-written script, but that wasn’t Whittaker’s fault. She
didn’t write it.

 
Jodie Whittaker is already a monster and an accomplice to genocide in
her own right, and the Timeless Child monster embedded within her is the
reason for it.
 

Liar! Jodie Whittaker is an actress!

If you’re not even going to try to pretend you understand the
difference between reality and fiction, there’s not much
point continuing.

--
solar penguin