Re: OFF-TOPIC: The woke cull of Redheads hits a new low!

On 28/05/2025 13:45, Idlehands wrote:

On 2025-05-28 6:21 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

On 28/05/2025 9:48 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0p6b1tt2w0jyp001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:
>

I will stick with the books and the movies. Harry Potter
never needed a TV series and this woke travesty is not the
Harry Potter I imagined.

>
Didn't read any of the books, but we saw all of the Harry
Potter movies at the cinema on release and we all enjoyed
them.

>
i stay away from Potter.

>
Why, what's wrong with Harry Potter?

>
Oh!! Come on, Blueshirt, what else could you expect from the local Bible Basher?? I mean 'Harry Potter' IS all about Magic and Wizards and such!!

 I don't recall anywhere in the book that described Snape as a "white man".
 

Either you've never read the books or you're illiterate.
In the books Snape is repeatedly described as  pale and 'sallow skinned' or with a 'sallow face'. He is also described as having shoulder length greasy black hair and a large hooked nose. None of these are the racial traits of a black man.
This implies to anyone with basic comprehension that he is of Caucasian decent. His police classification in the UK would be IC1 meaning North European.

Imagine the studio changing a fictional character's skin colour, how dare they...LOL.
 

And yet the same disgusting woke hypocrites and bigots constantly complain about black, brown, or dark skinned characters in fiction being race swapped.
It is totally unacceptable to change the race of a literary character when the primary audience consists of people from the same race as the character and his skin colour plays a part of his characterization.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner