Sujet : Re: Genesis of the Humans
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 01. Jul 2025, 02:06:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103vcap$2fg75$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
On 1/07/2025 4:41 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <103ufhd$29e2d$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 30/06/2025 13:12, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 29/06/2025 18:04, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
>
I'd tend to go with 'unreliable reader' for that part of
the story.
>
If you were as clever as you claim to be you would have gone
for 'unreliable translator' as you know full well most
history books, right or wrong, use the term Red Sea. So take
it up with them!
>
I don't need a translator fool! I can read the original
language.
>
<face palm> Maybe re-read what I typed and understand it...
I wasn't on about YOU - I was on about the people who have
translated the various books that use the term Red Sea!
>
Come down of your high horse and take a deep breath...
>
Only the stupid would think that a translation is trustworthy compared
to the original text in the original language.
Truth spoken.
Did YOU, Binky, actually READ and UNDERSTAND what Aggy wrote, Binky??
I'm thinking ..... NOT!!
-- Daniel70
Genesis of the Humans
Re: Genesis of the Humans
